List specific things about the presentation and use supportive and complimentary statements about parts of their presentation you liked. The group should focus their conversations on the three distinct things: They should not make eye contact with the presenter(s) and converse freely, as if the presenter was not even in the room. The second part begins with the Critical Friends group talking amongst themselves about the presentation. They should NOT ask for any clarification or ask any questions at this time. They should be jotting down notes as they are evaluating the presentation. In this initial step, the presenter(s) will describe their ideas, projects, or products to a Critical Friend group of 3-4 members. The model I am going to discuss is going to break Critical Friends into 4 parts: There are several models that are out there for this protocol. Critical Friends is powerful because it based on dialogue and reflection, both of which require effective communication and collaboration. This protocol can be used in a variety of ways by students, teachers, and administrators. One of the things we modeled at the conference was a protocol call “Critical Friends”. It was a great learning experience and I got many “take-aways” from it. Two summers ago I attended a PBL workshop in Sioux Falls, SD. I did not want to repeat myself about feedback in this post, even though that would not be the worst thing because of how effective this strategy really is. If you missed that post, please click on the link below. One of the first blog posts I created was on giving effective and timely feedback using various Google Apps and the Google Doc Add-on called Orange Slice Teacher Rubric.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |